Persepsi Guru IPA Terhadap Pembelajaran STEM

Icha Kurnia Wati, S. Suciati, Meida Wulan Sari, Febriani Sarwendah Asri Nugraheni
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32699/spektra.v7i2.203

Abstract


Abstrak

Pendekatan STEM merupakan alat untuk menghadapai abad 21 sekaligus alat untuk membenahi mutu pembelajaran sains di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali persepsi guru IPA terhadap pembelajaran STEM. Subjek penelitian adalah guru MGMP IPA di Surakarta dan Karanganyar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian studi kasus. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah angket. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi guru IPA yaitu: a) Mayoritas guru IPA masih kurang paham mengenai STEM; b) STEM merupakan sebuah pendekatan pembelajaran yang mengintegrasikan aspek sains, teknologi, matematik dan engineering; c) forum ilmiah seperti seminar, workshop, dan diklat pelatihan merupakan sumber utama promosi STEM bagi guru IPA; d) Mayoritas guru IPA memiliki persepsi bahwa STEM bermanfaat dalam meningkatkan keterampilan abad 21; e) Guru sangat tertarik menerapkan STEM dalam pembelajaran. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengan 85% responden telah menerapkan pembelajaran STEM dalam rancangan pembelajarannya; f) STEM merupakan suatu pendekatan pembelajaran yang relevan dengan kurikulum 2013 dan abad 21; g) mayoritas guru IPA merasa masih kesulitan dalam menerapkan pembelajaran STEM. Studi mengenai persepsi guru terhadap suatu pembelajaran berperan penting dalam penyusunan gagasan program-program pengembangan profesionalisme guru. Program tersebut harus sesuai dengan kebutuhan guru dalam hal pengetahuan konten dan pedagogis untuk menerapkan pembelajaran STEM di kelas.

Kata Kunci: Persepsi guru IPA, STEM

  

Abstract

The STEM approach is a tool to face the 21st century as well as a tool to improve the quality of science learning in Indonesia. This study aims to explore the perception of science teachers on STEM learning. The research subjects were MGMP science teachers in Surakarta and Karanganyar. This research is a case study research. The instrument used is a questionnaire. The results showed that the perceptions of science teachers were: a) The majority of science teachers still did not understand STEM; b) STEM is a learning approach that integrates aspects of science, technology, mathematics and engineering; c) scientific forums such as seminars, workshops, and training and education are the main sources of STEM promotion for science teachers; d) The majority of science teachers have the perception that STEM is useful in improving 21st century skills; e) Teachers are very interested in applying STEM in learning. This is evidenced by 85% of respondents have implemented STEM learning in their learning design; f) STEM is a learning approach that is relevant to the 2013 curriculum and 21st century learning; g) the majority of science teachers still find it difficult to implement STEM learning. The study of teachers' perceptions of learning plays an important role in formulating ideas for teacher professional development programs. The program must match the teacher's needs in terms of content and pedagogical knowledge to implement STEM learning in the classroom..

Keywords: Science teacher perceptions, STEM


Keywords


Persepsi guru IPA; STEM

References


Agustami, R. P. & Alimah, W. S. (2017). Persepsi Guru dan Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Serta Implikasinya di SMP. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6 (1), 96-103.

Anggraini, F.I dan Huzaifah, S. (2017). Implementasi STEM dalam pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA. STEM untuk Pembelajaran Sains Abad 21(pp. 722-731). Palembang : Universitas Sriwijaya.

Asghar, A. , Ellington, R. , Rice, E. , Johnson, F. , & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM Education in Secondary Science Contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 85-125. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349.

Baharin, N., Kamarudin, N., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2018). Integrating STEM Education Approach in Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810–822.

Baran, E, Bilici, S. D, Mesutoğlu, C. (2015). Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics (Stem) Public Service Announcement (Psa) Development Activity. Journal of inquiry based activitie, 5(2), 60-69.

Barcelona, K. (2014). 21st Century Curriculum Change Initiative: A Focus on STEM Education as an Integrated Approach to Teaching and Learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(10), 862-875. doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-4.

Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, Technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12 (5&6), 23-27.

Beers, S. Z. (2011). 21st century skills: Preparing students for their Future, 1-6.

Choy, C. S & Cheah,P. K. (2009). Teacher Perceptions of Critical Thinking Among Students and its Influence on Higher Education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 20(2), 198-206.

Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implication for education our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 74-85.

Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7 (2), 63-74.

EL-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM Integration in Schools: Views from In-service Science Teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 2459-2484.

Göçen, A., Eral S.H., & Bücük, M.H. (2020). Teacher Perceptions of a 21st Century Classroom. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 85-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.638110

Hakim, L. L., Sulatri, Y. L., Mudrikah, A., & Ahmatika, D. (2019). STEM Project-Based Learning Models in Learning Mathematics to Develop 21st Century Skills. ICSTI 2018. doiI 10.4108/eai.19-10-2018.2281357

Izzati, N., Tambunan, L. R., Susanti, S., Siregar, N. A. R. (2019). Pengenalan Pendekatan STEM sebagai Inovasi Pembelajaran Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 4(2), 92-99.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan .(2017). Panduan Penyusunan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah dan Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.

Kennedy, T.J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.

Khoiri, A W & Sunarno, W. (2018). Pendekatan Etnosains dalam Tinjauan Filsafat (Implementasi Model Pembelajaran STEM: Science, Technology, Enginering, and Mathematic). SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 4 (2), 145-153.

Khoiri, A , Nasokah , Amalia, T, Slamet, H. (2020). Analisis Kritis Pendidikan Sains di Indonesia: (Problematika, Solusi dan Model Keterpaduan Sains Dasar). SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 06 (1), 19-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32699/spektra.v6vi1i.132

Khoiriyah, N., Abdurrahman, & Wahyudi, I. (2018). Implementation Of STEM Learning Approach To Improve Students' Critical Thinking Ability On Sound Wave Materials. JRKPF UAD, 53-62.

Lawanto, O. , Butler, D., Cartier, S.C., Santoso, H.B., Goodridge, W., Lawanto, K.N. and Clark, D. (2013). Pattern of Task Interpretation and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies of High School Students and College Freshmen during an Engineering Design Project. Journal of Stem Education, 14 ( 4), 15-27.

Lestari, D. A., Astuti, B., & Darsono, T. (2018). Implementation of Student Worksheets with the STEM approach (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 202-207.

Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A., Moll, A. J., Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM Summer Institute: An Integrated Approach to Teacher Professional Development in STEM, Journal of STEM Education, 13(2) , 69-83.

Nugroho, O.F. Permanasari, A. Firman, A. (2019). The Movement Of Stem Education In Indonesia: Science Teachers’ Perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8 (3), 417-425. DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19252

Nwanekezi, A. U. and Nzokurum, J. C. (2010). Science teaching in Nigerian primary schools: The way forward. African Journal of Education and developmental studies, 7(1), 68-73.

Paramita, A. K., Dasna, I. W., Yahmin. (2019). Kajian Pustaka: Integrasi STEM untuk Keterampilan Argumentasi Dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 4(2), 92-9 9.

Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM education: inovasi dalam pembelajaran sains. In Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains). Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Sains dan Kompetensi Guru melalui Penelitian & Pengembangan dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Abad-21, 3, 23-34. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Retnowati, S., Riyadi, & Subanti, S. (2020). The STEM Approach: The Development Of Rectangular Module To Improve Critical Thinking Skill. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(1). 2-15.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology, 20-26. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/51616

Sartika, D. (2013). Pentingnya Pendidikan Berbasis STEM Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 3(3).

Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing Teacher Education And Professional Development Needs For The Implementation Of Integrated Approaches To STEM Education. International of Journal STEM Education, 4 (13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1

Siew, N.M; Amir, N; & Chong, C. L. (2015). The Perceptions Of Pre-Service And In-Service Teachers Regarding A Project-Based STEM Approach To Teaching Science. SpringerPlus, 4(8), 1-20. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-4-8

Srikoom, W; Deborah L. Hanuscin, D. L; and Faikhamtai, C. (2017). Perceptions Of In-Service Teachers Toward Teaching STEM In Thailand. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1.

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing Student 21 St Century Skills In Selected Exemplary Inclusive STEM High Schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations For Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. doi:10.5703/1288284314653.

Trisnowati, E. (2016). Model Keterpaduan Pembelajaran Sains Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal SPEKTRA: Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 2(1), 20-27.

Ugras, M. (2018). The Effect of STEM Activities on STEM Attitudes, Scientific Creavity and Motivation Beliefs of the Students and Their Views on STEM Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5), 165-182.

Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

White, D.W. (2014). What Is STEM Education and Why Is It Important?. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1-9.




Copyright (c) 2021 Icha Kurnia Wati, S. Suciati, Meida Wulan Sari, Febriani Sarwendah Asri Nugraheni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

SPEKTRA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kajian Sains is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Number of P-ISSN = 2442-9910 and E-ISSN = 2548-642X.


SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains Indexed by:

Hasil gambar untuk icmjeGambar terkaitGambar terkait
Gambar terkaitGambar terkaitGambar terkait
Gambar terkait